Defences to a Claim for Rectification

When a party alleges that an agreement should be rectified because it does not state the intention of the parties there may be a number of defences available. 

Typically, there could be a defence that the evidence in support is simply insufficient to make out the case for making the orders. Other grounds arise within the equitable jurisdiction and include matters such as laches, delay and acquiesence. This may apply where thas dilatory conduct on the part of the party who wants the relied. 

For more information about the possible grounds for defending a claim for rectification contact us to book a conference to discuss your options. 

* Disclaimer:- This publication contains general information which may not suit your particular needs or circumstances. It may be summarised and include generalisations. Details that may be important in your specific circumstances might not be included. Litigant strives to ensure that the information in this publication is accurate and up-to-date, but does not represent or guarantee that it is accurate, reliable, current, complete or suitable. You should independently evaluate and verify the accuracy, reliability, currency, completeness and suitability of the information, before you rely on it. The information in this publication is not legal or other professional advice. You should obtain independent legal or professional advice that is tailored to your particular circumstances if you have concerns. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Litigant excludes liability for any loss, however caused (including by negligence), relating to or arising directly or indirectly from using or relying on any content in this publication. Litigant asserts copyright over the content of this publication.